| From: | Jason W Neyers <jneyers@uwo.ca> |
| To: | obligations <obligations@uwo.ca> |
| Date: | 17/11/2022 17:14:34 UTC |
| Subject: | ODG: Vicarious Performance in Contract Law |
Dear Colleagues:
Suppose that A wants to ship something (a book) from Toronto to X in another location. A contracts with B Ltd. to do the shipping. The book arrives and X takes possession. It turns out that as a matter of fact B Ltd. did not do the shipping
(or all of the shipping) but instead that other contractors did. Can A sue for breach? Can A refuse to pay the contract price if it is demanded by B Ltd? Why is the answer to these questions generally no? Is it just a question of contract interpretation or
is there some legal recognition that B Ltd actually performed the contract through the “agency” of the other contractors, who performed on B Ltd’s behalf?
If anyone has any views on this or knows of any good discussions in caselaw, article or textbooks, I would be delighted to be pointed in the right direction.
Sincerely,
Jason Neyers
Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
Western University
Law Building Rm 26
e. jneyers@uwo.ca
t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)
| You're receiving this message because you're a member of the obligations group from The University of Western Ontario. To take part in this conversation, reply all to this message. |
| View group files | Leave group | Learn more about Microsoft 365 Groups |